Multi-tabling is extremely common in the world of online poker.
Many players will choose to sit at multiple tables at the same time, and will see and play considerably more hands per hour than those who do not. Of course, there is justification for this: if you are proven to be a winning player at the stakes which you are playing, more volume equals more money.
However, playing numerous tables at once also has its downsides. Multi-tabling negatively impacts your ability to think about the decisions you face on the felt in a major way.
With limited time to think about your strategy for each hand, you’ll make decisions without considering the reasons why you should or should not make them. Bad strategic habits can develop when multi-tabling and playing at a single table once in a while will help eliminate those bad habits.
Multi-tabling is a great way to boost your hourly and bankroll, but this article will demonstrate how focusing on one table is a great way to fine-tune your poker game.
First, I’ll provide commentary on a 5-minute session I played while on 4 tables. I’ll then do the same thing while playing a single table. See for yourself how much more strategic consideration is given when playing only one table!
Prefer watching to reading? Scroll to the bottom of this page for the video version of this article.
First, I played a 4-table session–consisting of three $10/$20 NLH tables and one $10/20 PLO table–on the Ignition network. Mixing game types, as I’ve done here, in itself isn’t advisable as different variants of poker demand different strategies.
Playing different games at the same time can get confusing for this reason, so it is recommended to stick to one type of poker when multi-tabling. I decided to throw in the PLO table when there was a serious lack of NLH action on the site.
The first interesting hand of the session occurs on the 4-handed PLO table.
Hero is dealt in the CO
Hero raises to $70 (3.5x), BTN folds, SB calls $60 more, BB folds
This hand can also be folded preflop, but my open is justified given that players at these stakes generally don’t 3-bet enough. I like this opening size, as it decreases the likelihood of multiple players seeing a flop and increases the chance of me playing the hand in position.
(Pot: $160) The flop comes
SB checks, Hero checks back
The flop gives us top pair and a gutshot straight-draw. The SB checks, and I elect to check back as my hand is both too thin to be bet for value and susceptible to a check-raise. By checking, I control the size of the pot and retain my equity to see a turn.
(Pot: $160) The turn is the
SB checks again, Hero checks back
(Pot: $160) The river is the
SB bets $160, Hero calls $160
Hero wins $480 with two pair.
In regards to my focus, I noticed that I stopped paying attention to the action on other tables when faced with the river bet on the PLO table. I was fortunate that I didn’t have any other hands to play whilst in this spot; had I been pressured to make other decisions at the time, I might not have been able to think about villain’s bet long enough to make the call.
The next couple of action hands occur at the same time and I begin to notice how my thought processes become more rushed than I’d like.
Hero is dealt in the BB
CO raises to $70, BTN folds, SB folds, Hero 3-bets to $220, CO calls $150 more
(Pot: $450) The flop comes
Hero checks, CO bets $225, Hero raises to $1,125, CO jams for $2650 total, Hero calls
The money goes in on the flop after I check-raise with a pair of Kings, a gutshot straight-draw and the second-nut flush draw.
The CO shows
(Pot: $5830) The turn is the
That’s not a good card.
(Pot: $5830) The river is the
CO wins $5830 with a full house.
Meanwhile, at one of the NL tables.
Hero is dealt in the CO
Hero raises to $40, BTN calls, SB calls, BB folds
(Pot: $153) The flop comes
SB checks, Hero bets $80, BTN calls, SB folds
(Pot: $313) The turn is the
Hero bets $220, BTN calls
(Pot: $753) The river is the
Hero checks, BTN checks back
BTN wins $753 with a pair of Kings.
I c-bet the flop into 2 players. After getting called, I barrel again on the turn. I found that I wasn’t able to think about this hand as much as I’d like (especially in terms of optimal bet sizing for my range), as I was still thinking about the $6,000 pot I was in the middle of losing.
You’ll find that situations like this occur all too frequently when playing poker multi-tabling. It can be difficult to think about a decision on one table clearly and fully when you are trying to deal with the inevitable variance of poker on another.
Focusing On A Single Table
After playing a multi-table session, I decided to focus all my attention on a single $10/$20 NLH table. The aim of this was to emphasize the opportunity that 1-tabling presents, allowing you to think about strategy in great detail without being disrupted by action at other tables.
I instantly noticed the way in which I was paying attention to every detail at the table – even during hands which I was not playing. As poker is a game of imperfect information, you must use every piece of information that you can to inform your strategic decisions. By taking note of the tendencies of your opponents, you can begin to develop strategies to exploit them.
This type of in-depth analysis is simply not available when multi-tabling; gathering information on your opponents when you can will help you make those big reads when you need to.
(Note: Crush your opponents no matter how many tables you play! Join the Upswing Lab by clicking below.)
The first playable hand I get dealt is a premium one.
Hero is dealt from the BTN
Hero raises to $50, SB folds, BB folds
Hero wins $30
I open to 2.5x and unfortunately both the SB and BB fold. Given the time I have to reflect upon my play now that I am 1-tabling, I am able to consider my opening size. Raising to 2.5x may be perceived as a size that a ‘reg’ (experienced poker player) would use. Therefore, on reflection, I figured that I could use an opening size that is perceived as one used by weak players, such as the min-raise.
Again, single-tabling provided me with an opportunity to give thought to these more subtle aspects of my poker game. Had I been multi-tabling, a nuanced strategic adjustment such as this one would likely have gone unnoticed.
Hero is dealt in the SB
BTN raises to $50, Hero 3-bets to $190, BTN 4-bets to $420, Hero calls
(Pot: $858) The flop comes
Hero checks, BTN checks
(Pot: $858) The turn is the
Hero checks, BTN bets $390, Hero folds
The importance of reflection was demonstrated again after I lost this hand.
After the action, I was able to give more thought to my strategy when responding to 4-bets after 3-betting with middle pocket-pairs. Like with the open sizing considerations made after the AdKd hand, the slower pace of poker when playing only one table allowed me to dedicate time honing a particular aspect of my game.
The Benefits Of Single Tabling Compared to Multi-Tabling
While multi-tabling undoubtedly has its place in online poker, focusing on only one table during a session will improve your game at a much faster rate.
When playing many hands at once, players have a tendency to make automatic decisions and give little thought to spots that can be strategically eye-opening when looked at more closely.
If you give yourself the necessary time required to properly think about a specific hand or action, you will begin to recognize the more subtle elements of poker strategy that require attention in order to rank among the very elite in the game.
Best of all, dedicating time to consider specific spots in-depth during these 1-tabling sessions will make your multi-tabling game stronger and more confident in the future.
(Note: Want to take your poker game to the next level? Check out the Upswing Lab, an A-to-Z poker training course created by Doug Polk & Ryan Fee. The Lab is the best and quickest way to improve your poker game, but don’t take my word for it, see what our members are saying!)
Why Multi-Tabling Is Costing You Money (Video)