Poker Millionaire Reveals His Strategy on Monotone Flops (♠️ ♠️ ♠️)
Poker Millionaire Reveals His Strategy on Monotone Flops (♠️ ♠️ ♠️)
The text below is based on the video above.
Most poker players misplay monotone flops (a flop with three cards of the same suit).
This is likely because they are under-researched. When poker players study, they generally start with the most common flop types (as they should).
The mistake players make is treating monotone flops just like the "normal" flop types they're more familiar with.
The best poker players know that monotone flops are quite different from "normal" flops. They're a bit weird, and the strategy you should use needs to account for that.
You're about to learn a better approach for monotone flops, and a lot of the advice in this article will help you improve on other board types as well.
So, let's dive in!
This is part 1 of Alex "Kanu7" Millar's new strategy series! Parts 2, 3, 4 and 5 will be published on this blog over the course of the next month.
Alex is one of poker's biggest-ever cash game winners, and he's joined the Upswing team to create content that will help you elevate your cash game skills.
How Things Change on Monotone Flops
Alex starts the video by comparing the average bet frequency and sizing for all flops versus monotone flops (calculated using a private solver). This table sums up the comparison:
As you can see, the bet frequency has lowered from 62% to 51% and the bet sizes skew smaller. To quote Alex:
So, for some reason we've decided that we are going to put a lot less money in on monotone flops, when we're c-betting, than on other flops. Not only are we c-betting less often, but we're also c-betting smaller sizes on average.
And [the reason for this] is not immediately intuitive. Both players have got some flushes [in their range]. Both players have got a bunch of flush draws [in their range]. If you're just thinking about how the equities of each range match up against each other, you might think there's not a huge amount of difference between a monotone flop and a non-monotone flop.
Yet we're really reluctant to put in as much money as we normally are. Let's have a think about why that is.
Before getting into Alex's specific advice for c-betting on monotone flops, it's important to understand bet sizing fundamentals.
Bet Sizing Fundamentals
When your range has far more very strong hands than your opponent's range, you're generally going to want to bet big with those strong hands (and the appropriate number of bluffs for balance). On the other hand...
When your range contains far fewer very strong hands than your opponent's range, you're generally going to be limited to betting small.
There are other factors to consider, of course, but the rules of thumb above are a great starting point.
Let's take a look at a couple example flops featuring one of the best cash game players of all time, OtB_RedBaron.
3-handed $200/$400 on PokerStars. Effective stacks of $42,919.
OtB_RedBaron raises to $870 on the button. Alex folds. Phil Ivey calls from the big blind.
Flop ($1,940) A♣ K♦ 9♣
Ivey checks. OtB_RedBaron bets $2,651. Ivey folds.
Why do you think OtB_RedBaron chose to bet so big (1.4 times the pot) on this flop? Click "Show Answer" below when you're ready.
The next example:
4-handed $200/$400 on PokerStars. Effective stacks of $125,542.
OtB_RedBaron raises to $1,010 on the button. TrueTeller folds. Alex calls from the big blind.
Flop ($2,220) 5♠ 4♠ 2♥
Alex checks. OtB_RedBaron bets $686. Alex folds.
Contrary to the last hand, OtB_RedBaron chose to use a small bet size (30% of the pot). Why do you think he chose this small size?
Bet Sizing on Monotone Flops
How do the two examples above relate to monotone flops? Here's what Alex had to say:
If we think about a monotone flop, it is [much more like] the second example. It's not exactly like the second example -- things are a little bit different...
...but what's going to be very clear is both players have a bunch of flushes. So, at the top of the ranges, it is going to be relatively equal...
After that, we've got the sets and two pairs. Any advantage we have in the [number of] sets and two pairs is just going to be a little further down in our ranges.
So we're not going to be able to bet the really big sizes that we see in other situations, like that A-K-9. That's why monotone flops end up with a smaller bet size than other flops.
For example:
3-handed $100/$200 on PokerStars. Effective stacks of $18,073.
OtB_RedBaron raises to $435. forhayley folds. Alex calls in the big blind.
Flop ($970) Q♥ T♥ 2♥
Alex checks. OtB_RedBaron bets $299. Alex folds.
As you can see, OtB_RedBaron used a 31% pot-sized bet on this monotone flop. That's the same size he used in the second example flop (5♠ 4♠ 2♥).
Takeaways
Alex concluded the video by going over the main takeaways:
- Big advantage at the top of the ranges → Bet bigger size.
- Most of our hands that want to bet are weaker → Bet smaller size.
- No big advantage at the top of the ranges → Not using big sizes.
- On monotone flops, use a default strategy of c-betting half the time for a 25-33% pot sizing.
If you want to hear each of these takeaways explained in greater detail, watch at least the last 2.5 minutes of Alex's video.
Keep an eye out for Alex's second video to learn about facing c-bets on monotone flops and more. That's coming out Friday (December 13th) here on the Upswing Poker blog.
Before you go, a quick question...
Versus OtB_RedBaron's c-bet on that Q♥ T♥ 2♥ flop, what hands would you check-raise in Alex's spot? Drop your answer below!
Ready for part 2? Click here.
