So far, things have been going well for Doug Polk in his Heads Up Grudge Match versus Daniel Negreanu.
Since the $200/$400 Challenge began in early November, Doug has jumped out to an $814,290 lead through the first 10,784 hands.
Doug recently posted a Reddit AMA (Ask Me Anything) thread in which he answered the poker community’s most burning questions regarding the challenge. I went through that thread to highlight the top questions that Doug took the time to answer.
These are many of the questions I’ve heard time and time again on social media and in the live chat during the challenge. So, if you’ve had a question about Doug’s challenge, there’s a good chance it’s answered below.
Let’s jump in.
Note: For the most up-to-date information on the challenge as it progresses, visit our tracking page.
Going in, I assumed it would be 10-20 bb/100 [big blinds per 100 hands] depending on how hard he worked. I also recognized he could get it down to 5 bb/100 or so if he was particularly sharp. It was going to be very hard for him to get it down to 0-5 bb/100, although I suppose that’s possible.
The side bets are at 4:1, and the breakeven point on that is approximately 8 bb/100. I was pretty confident to be ahead of that mark.
I think overall my relationship with Daniel has gotten a lot better through this. I would say before we had a lot of animosity, but now it’s subsided a good amount.
We don’t see eye-to-eye on a variety of issues, but I don’t think he is a bad person or anything. I don’t see us being friends following this. But yeah, it’s at least on some reasonable terms now.
No clue. I think he will play it out. It’s been competitive enough so far for him to play the second half. I don’t think he is the kind of guy to say he will play it out and then quit.
Then again, if he goes on a really bad run at this point it could be gg. Hard to say.
Might take a couple soft spots if they come up, but no big battles vs top guys. To be honest, I’m already looking forward to not playing anymore poker.
I thought if Daniel was particularly good, there would be outlier scenarios where I could lose $1,000,000 or so. I didn’t think it was likely, however.
Of course he has a chance. The question is it like 0.1% or 1% or 10%.
So far my win-rate has been 21 bb/100 or so, but let’s calculate using my all-in EV of 14 bb/100 because that is probably more fair. Also assuming a ~150 standard deviation and ~18k hands.
If he is losing at 14 bb/100 he is about 4% to win more than 17 buy-ins [enough to take the lead at the time of writing] by the end of the challenge. So that’s 25:1.
Now we can make some assumptions either way. Let’s say he improves and has been running bad situationally…
(I don’t think that he has been btw. He has certainly run bad in all-in pots. I think it’s fair to credit those back to him in an EV calculation, but situationally there isn’t a good way for us to know who has been running better. But for the sake of argument let’s go with that.)
… and let’s say he only loses at 8 theoretical bb/100 for the rest of the challenge. Then his chance to win goes up to 10-15% or so.
But it could also go the other way, let’s say we are underestimating his loss-rate and its closer to 20, He is probably a 100:1 dog to win. Lot of assumptions getting thrown around.
If I had to guess, I would say he is probably gonna on average lose at about 10-15 theoretical bb/100 over the rest of the challenge. If he keeps getting better and eliminates some of the bigger mistakes maybe he gets that down to 5-10. Time will tell. Frankly, it’s a lot of fucking random ass guessing.
If I had to predict, if this goes the full 25k hands I would say I expect to win ~$1,400,000
It’s hard to say because I don’t really view poker like that anymore. I think that it would be a very close match between the two. It’s so hard to say because it was just such a different era and now I approach the game so differently.
Way less solved, way more complicated. Lower edges, higher variance, worse players. Could be a good option for some.
Almost certainly not going to play after this. But I cant say absolutely. Let’s just enjoy this while we have it.
Monotone boards are a mind-fuck. You bet small and check a lot. Who knew.
Let me know in the comments. Maybe the commentators will even ask your question to Doug in one of their post-match interviews on the Upswing Twitch channel!
Want to learn about Doug’s favorite poker tactic? Read 3 Hand Examples That Will Help You Overbet Better.
Note: Learn step-by-step how to become the best player at the table when you join the Upswing Lab training course. Elite pros have been adding new content every week for the past four years, and you get all of it when you join. Learn more now!
Leave a Comment